Meghan Markle attended charity event ‘just for photographs’

In a recent charity gala for the Los Angeles Children’s Hospital, Meghan Markle‘s appearance is already stirring controversy, particularly from a former friend.

Lizzie Cundy, a British socialite and radio host, didn’t hold back when discussing the Duchess of Sussex’s motivation for attending the event, suggesting it was more about the spotlight than about supporting the philanthropic cause.

Cundy, who was also present at the gala, characterized Meghan’s visit as a mere photo opportunity.

“She seemed to be there for the photographs,” Cundy remarked, highlighting what she perceived as a lack of warmth from the audience towards Meghan’s arrival.

This sentiment reflects a broader skepticism about the Duchess’s ongoing public presence in Los Angeles.

The gala, which took place on October 5, saw Meghan stepping out with a notably different look.

Opting for soft waves instead of her typical sleek hairstyle, she wore a modest amount of jewelry and understated makeup alongside a striking red dress that many might recognize from a previous occasion.

This time she chose a simpler appearance by forgoing the dramatic train of her expensive gown.

Cundy, donning a dress similar to Meghan’s but far less costly, expressed her thoughts candidly, stating, “Meghan needs LA more than LA needs her.” She suggested that many locals feel deceived by the Duchess, indicating a growing ambivalence toward her image in the city.

Amidst this criticism, Meghan’s appearance came at a time of particularly critical media coverage about her and her husband, Prince Harry.

The couple’s relationship with the royal family has visibly soured, which Cundy noted has altered how they are received in Los Angeles.

“Harry and Meghan were loved because they represented the royal family,” she said, “but their negative comments about the royals have changed that dynamic significantly.”

Interestingly, Cundy’s history with Meghan adds another layer to the unfolding narrative.

She and Meghan had been friends when they first met at a charity event in 2013.

However, as soon as Meghan became engaged to Harry, their friendship dwindled.

Cundy described the experience of being ignored as “ghosted,” revealing that Meghan cut off contact entirely after securing her engagement.

Reflecting on this past, she noted that Meghan seems to have repeated this pattern with other acquaintances, stating, “She’s ghosted quite a lot of people, obviously, including her family.” This paints a picture of a person who has withdrawn from her previous connections, leading to a wide array of speculation about her current social dealings.

In Meghan’s defense, her official website later shared the reasons behind her attendance at the gala.

It emphasized her commitment to the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and acknowledged her enduring relationship with the institution.

The statement conveyed her pride in being present with other distinguished guests to highlight the essential services the hospital offers to children in the region.

The gala had a significant focus on supporting children and families, with Meghan’s participation intended to spotlight her ongoing dedication to various charitable causes.

The statement concluded with a heartfelt appreciation for CHLA’s work in the community.

Despite her presence at the event, there were moments that hinted at Meghan’s desire to step away from the limelight.

Photographs captured her mingling briefly with guests before she made her exit.

Her close friend Kelly McKee Zajfen accompanied her, demonstrating the value of support within her inner circle.

As Meghan navigates these public appearances, speculation continues about her and Harry’s separate engagements.

Sources have suggested that Harry may even be pursuing his own path to establish credibility independent of Meghan, as he was spotted enjoying time with friends recently without her by his side.

This latest saga in Meghan’s journey underscores a pattern of public scrutiny and personal relationships mixed with the complexities of celebrity, philanthropy, and royal legacy.

Cundy’s remarks offer just a glimpse into the evolving narrative surrounding the Duchess, which seems to sway between admiration and skepticism.

With the world watching, the intricate tapestry of Meghan’s life—filled with glamour, charity, and controversy—remains compelling.

What will be the lasting impact of such critical perspectives on her public persona moving forward?

The answer may rest within her future actions and engagements in the vibrant tapestry of California’s philanthropic landscape.