Meghan Markle ‘disliked the royal hierarchy’ & wanted to be ‘Princess Diana II’

Sources close to Meghan Markle reveal that she had a deep-seated discontent with the royal hierarchy, finding it frustrating and akin to “babies” squabbling over trivial matters.

According to insiders, Meghan was not only critical of royal dynamics but also harbored aspirations to carry on the philanthropic legacy of Princess Diana, albeit on her own terms and in a “part-time” manner.

In his upcoming book, Yes Ma’am: The Secret Life of Royal Servants, royal commentator Tom Quinn uncovers the intricacies of Meghan’s mind, referencing what some have termed her “messiah complex.” A former member of her staff recounted that Meghan saw certain royal protocols as pointless, crafted solely to maintain the hierarchical status among the royals.

Interestingly, while Prince Harry has been described as one of the most amiable royals to work with, he was also perceived as somewhat muddled, reminiscent of a character from the television series Blackadder.

Staff would joke that Harry would struggle to dress himself without assistance, reflecting a certain carefree attitude that contrasted with Meghan’s ambitions.

Quinn suggests that Meghan was inherently a modernizer who sought out change.

She had a knack for galvanizing support among junior staff, rallying them to her vision.

Yet, it appears her independent streak clashed with longstanding royal traditions.

Buckingham Palace management reportedly grew concerned when they realized Meghan intended to chart her own course without aligning with existing royal strategies.

According to one source, Meghan seemed oblivious to the fact that joining the royal family meant adhering to its established norms.

There was a prevailing thought that her desire to stand out would never mesh with the royal expectation that the Queen remained the focal point of public attention.

Despite this friction, Harry reportedly enjoyed the idea of shaking things up; however, royal aides hoped he would encourage Meghan to conform more closely to royal expectations.

Witnesses noted this divergence marked the beginning of Harry’s unwavering defense of Meghan, regardless of the controversy that surrounded her actions.

A past staff member emphasized Meghan’s determination to fulfill what she believed was her destiny, saying, “What Diana started, I want to finish.” This indicated her dream of becoming a global advocate for those in need, striving to be a beloved figure within the royal fold, but with a twist: she envisioned doing this while balancing her new lifestyle.

There was a prevailing sentiment among staff that Meghan occasionally felt looked down upon by court officials, who were often dismissive of her progressive approach.

Acknowledging this, some insiders admired her resilience.

“You’ve got to hand it to her,” one staff member said, recognizing her tenacity in navigating the complexities of royal life.

However, the royal establishment’s reluctance to embrace change created friction, especially for Meghan, who was trying to implement her vision.

Her transition to Kensington Palace was marked by awkward encounters, described by one former aide as a spirited clash between her assertive leadership style and the historical rigidity of the royal service.

After stepping back from royal duties in 2020, Meghan and Harry made it clear that they sought to build a more independent path, reflecting Harry’s long-standing desire to escape royal constraints.

They expressed their intent to balance their roles between the UK and North America in a move that would redefine their relationship with the monarchy and establish a new charitable direction.

Insiders also noted that Meghan faced challenges adapting to established protocols, such as meticulously scheduling her appearances to avoid overlapping with senior royals.

This meticulousness seemed to stifle her natural inclination towards spontaneity and innovation.

The complexity of her relationship with royal staff was highlighted further by her mixed rapport.

Although initially friendly and approachable, instances of frustration surfaced when staff couldn’t accommodate her immediate demands.

This behavior eventually led to her acquiring the somewhat unflattering moniker “Duchess of Difficult,” although many sympathized with her struggle in such a confining environment.

In a world steeped in tradition, Meghan’s desire for reform was met with skepticism from the old guard of royal advisors who saw her as an outsider.

While some appreciated her passion for change, many more stood firmly in defense of the status quo, leaving Meghan in a lonely fight to redefine her role and legacy.

Through it all, Meghan Markle remained a formidable player in the royal game—a woman with aspirations and a vision that stretched far beyond the confines of tradition, yet continually pulled back by the very institution she sought to transform.

Her journey exemplified the tension between youthful ambition and deeply entrenched protocols, leaving a lasting impression on the modern royal narrative.