Meghan Markle had a ‘messiah complex,’ believed she would save royal family

In a recent revelation, a new book has emerged that digs deep into Meghan Markle‘s time as a member of the royal family, painting her as someone who believed she had a higher calling.

Journalist Tom Quinn’s work, entitled Yes Ma’am: The Secret Life of Royal Servants, explores the intricacies of royal life through the eyes of former staff, shedding light on what many describe as Meghan’s “messiah complex.” This perspective suggests that she viewed herself as destined to fulfill Princess Diana’s legacy, aiming to champion the marginalized and the needy.

The book, featured in The Times of London, highlights the tensions between Meghan and the royal hierarchy.

According to former aides, Meghan’s approach was to advocate for change and support charitable endeavors on a global scale.

One source noted that her desire to “finish what Diana started” indicated her ambition to become a modern-day savior within the royal framework.

However, she envisioned executing this role with the royal family’s backing, albeit on a more flexible basis.

As the narratives unfold, they reveal Prince William‘s unease about Meghan’s behavior.

Some staff suggested that Meghan’s friendly demeanor, marked by her physical warmth, was misinterpreted as flirting, which left William feeling apprehensive.

Staffers recounted instances where the dynamics created awkward moments, particularly among royal family members who were accustomed to a more restrained decorum.

The backlash Meghan reportedly faced was akin to that of her sister-in-law, Kate Middleton, who, during her early years in the family, encountered her share of snobbery.

The book notes that while Kate eventually mastered the nuances of royal life, maintaining a graceful resilience, Meghan found herself grappling with feelings of alienation from palace insiders.

A source reflected that Meghan’s perspectives seemed at odds with the institution’s rich history, suggesting she had underestimated the values upheld for centuries by the royal family.

Among the more colorful anecdotes shared by former staff, Meghan received nicknames such as “Duchess Difficult” and “Mystic Meg.”

The latter alludes to her alleged penchant for spiritual and holistic practices, which some insiders remarked made traditional royals, including William and King Charles, visibly uncomfortable.

The former Suits actress never shied away from expressing her affectionate nature, claiming she believed in the art of hugs—a stark contrast to the more reserved royal approach.

Living arrangements also played a role in Meghan’s sentiments regarding her place in the royal family.

When she and Harry were assigned Nottingham Cottage, many sources indicated that Meghan perceived the modest abode as indicative of her perceived status within the family.

She reportedly took this as a slight, interpreting the cottage’s humble size as a reflection of how the royal family viewed her husband.

Further complicating matters, a former communicative team member pointed out that Meghan quickly realized Harry was not as central in royal activities compared to William, leading her to worry about his stature.

This awareness, they believe, contributed to her heightened protectiveness towards Harry, pulling him into involvement with social causes that many saw as a departure from royal traditions.

Recognized for his thorough research, Quinn’s book presents a different layer of royal life, one that not only revisits Meghan’s ambitions but also humanizes the royals, particularly Prince William.

Described as having a “needy” personality, William’s experiences reveal a man who has carried the weight of expectation throughout his life, at times showing vulnerability that starkly contrasts with the public’s perception of him.

Also under scrutiny is Prince Andrew, characterized in the book as a somewhat spoiled individual, whose uniqueness led him to treat some staff poorly for trivial reasons.

His demeanor adds another dimension to the complex relationships within the royal sphere, highlighting issues of entitlement and emotional immaturity that existing staff witnessed across the board.

Quinn’s work doesn’t shy away from addressing the emotional undertones of royal duties.

Meghan’s friendships with staff—the line of appropriate behavior—also came under fire, suggesting that her warmth may have been misinterpreted, resulting in discomfort and conflict within the royal household.

The intricacies unveiled by this book offer not just scandalous claims but also deliver insights into a world where tradition clashes with modernity, and where personal aspirations vie for space against a backdrop of deeply ingrained protocol.

These revelations signal a pivotal moment, not only for the individuals involved but also for the institution of the monarchy navigating through evolving societal norms.